One photograph, one degraded copy of it, one site, and five modern representations. Each is labelled for what it is.
Only two images in this gallery are photographic evidence of Pritilata Waddedar: a single undated studio portrait, and a degraded reproduction of the same portrait. Everything else is either a photograph of a place, or a modern sculpture or rendering made long after her death.
They are all worth looking at. They are not all the same kind of thing, and this archive does not display them as though they were.
The plates
8 of 8 plates shown.
Using these imagesSelect any plate to open it at full size, where it is shown complete and uncropped. Use the arrow keys to move between plates and Escape to close. Nothing in this archive crops a face or alters an image beyond resizing and compression for the web.
Why there are so few images
She died at twenty-one in 1932, in a provincial city, as a member of an illegal organisation. Almost nobody in that position was photographed more than once.
Photography in Bengal at the time was a studio activity: expensive, formal, and undertaken for occasions. A clerk’s family might commission a handful of portraits in a decade. Once she went underground in June 1932 the possibility disappeared entirely, and there is no reason to think a wanted revolutionary sat for a photographer.
What survives, then, is one plate — and then eighty years of people making new images out of it. The statues, the colourised portraits and the film performances are all attempts to give a face more presence than a single small photograph can carry.
That is a perfectly human response. It is also worth noticing, because the accumulating interpretations can start to feel like evidence.